1. Ottimino Biglieri Vineyard Dry Creek Valley Zinfandel 2006, Score=2+
Color is dark ruby/garnet but slightly lighter than our usual cab color. Nose is very nice with floral notes. Palate has nice upfront mixed fruit with more red fruit such as raspberry leading to moderate tannin. Mid-palate is a bit thin and finish is rather short. Cab-Merlot blend was suggested but in the second tasting, the consensus was California Cabernet. This is California Zinfandel.
Information gleaned from the Internet about Ottimino Biglieri Vineyard 2006 Dry Creek Valley Zinfandel is shown below:
TASTING NOTES:
"Aromas of blackberry syrup and pomegranate interlace with black cherry and spicy French oak. The entry on the palate is juicy, adding flavors of boysenberry and ripe raspberry. The tannins are smooth and round and the expansive mid-palate leads to a firm and persistent finish. The balance of this quintessential Zinfandel allows great versatility with food, and its deceptive heartiness will reward experiments with exotic pairings."
TECHNICAL NOTES
Production Details
Blend: 100% Zinfandel
Vineyard: Biglieri (48 year old vines)
Appellation: Dry Creek Valley
Cooperage: Francois Freres, Roberts (custom-built)
Aging: Nineteen months
Barrel Age: 50% new & 50% 1- & 2-year-old
Production: 150 cases produced
[ADD ON ON 4-19-10]
4. Paloma Merlot 2005, Score=2+
Color is dark with slight purple hue. Nose has some soy sauce and herbal/medicinal quality such as rosemary and thyme. Plate is a bit muted with mixed fruit and noticeable oak component but somewhat thin mid-palate leading to moderate tannin. Cali Cab and Cali Zim were suggested. This turned out to be Paloma Merlot. We tasted this exact wine in June 2008. We gave an identical score of 2+ and this is what we said then;
"Nose has fruits, chocolate, vanilla and caramel but whether it has “funk” depended on the taster. Uncle-E felt that this is definite funk but the rest of us could not perceive it. The palate is nice with good fruits laced with vanilla, chocolate and caramel (definitely new world) with some sweetness in the finish. Nice wine. After some discussion and help from Uncle-E, Piroca uttered “Merlot” and even guessed Paloma (this is due to the shape and color of the bottle and the fact Uncle-E previously brought Paloma Merlot 2004). Although I could not get exact percentage but this one contains small amount (12-18%) of cabernet sauvignon as well."
5. Harlan Estate, The Maiden Napa Valley Oakville Cabernet Sauvignon 2006, score=3+
Color is nice dark garnet. Nose has citrus, caramel and jam notes with minerals (pencil shaving). Palate has nice upfront back fruit with vanilla and chocolate leading to big chewy tannin and long finish. Tannin tasted a bit too big and may require some aging. Our consensus was Cali cab.This was a just released maiden 2006.
Although we all liked this big Cali Cab, we were not as impressed as we have been with prior vintages. Piroca claims that our venue of tasting makes any wine more oak pronounced..maybe due to miasma exuding from the furniture. He thought it tasted much better when he had it at home last night. We do not doubt it.
We think we should keep this wine for some years before tasting it again.
6. David Arthur Elevation 1147 2004, score=3
This wine was tasted uncovered since we had already uncovered the last 5 wines when Uncle-E appeared with this bottle. Color is nice dark garnet. Nose is muted. Palate has nice black fruit with nice well-integrated tannin. It tasted a bit thin. This is one of the coveted Napa cult wines but, this night, we were not too impressed.
91 points Wine Spectator:
"Pushes ripe fruit to the edge of jam, with blackberry and wild berry flavors that are more supple and balanced on the palate than the aromas suggest. Impressive for its balance, grace and finesse. Best from 2008 through 2014. 245 cases made. (6/15/07)"
4 comments:
The group's taste in wine sure has changed. Something is wrong when the group isn't that impressed with Maiden or David Arthur?
We are getting jaded and our tasting venue is also being blamed for good wines not tasting good as compared to dining at a nice restaurant or sitting in your deck in nice warm spring days. Other alternative explanation is that we all do not know anything about wine.
Something went wrong on Friday; hard to believe that these great wines did not measure up-but this is what happened-the moon was not in its house-or whatever; it was a jinxed tasting.
Maybe the group should go back to drinking $10-$15 wine.
Post a Comment